3D technology applied to digital prostheses for adults who have suffered occupational accidents resulting in amputation
Main Article Content
Keywords
Digital amputation, hand functionality, rehabilitation, 3D prosthesis
Abstract
Introduction: Digital amputations in workers who suffer occupational accidents can have a great impact on manual function, on the perception of abilities, self-image and mental health, which can affect their daily occupational performance in different areas. The objective of the study was to describe the change in hand functionality and in the perception of disability in patients with digital amputation after using a 3D prosthesis during a period of 6 months. Users and methods: Analysis of cases with a pre-experimental pre-test and post-test design with a descriptive scope. Three quantitative instruments were used to evaluate the change in hand functionality, perception of disability and perception of quality of life during and after the use of the prosthesis in 8 users with digital amputation. Results: Significant changes were evidenced after the intervention. In general terms, an increase in hand functionality is observed, as well as positive changes in the perception of disability from the use of the prosthesis. Conclusions: This first scientific approach to the evaluation of the use of 3D prostheses opens new questions and generates contributions regarding the improvement of hand functionality for patients with digital amputation. The flexibility for custom-made prosthesis designs in conjunction with an analysis of the profile, occupational performance, and daily activities of these patients can improve the quality of life, the perception of disability, and increase satisfaction with their functionality.
References
Johns Hopkins Medicine. Treatments, test and Therapies. c2021. [citado el 05 de enero de 2021] Disponible en: https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/treatment- tests-and-therapies/amputation.
Burger H, Maver T, Marincek C. Partial hand amputation and work. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2007;29(17): 1321-1317. doi: 10.1080/09638280701 320763.
Pandian G, Hamid F, Hammond M. Rehabilitation of the patient with peripheral vascular disease and diabetic foot problems. In: DeLisa JA, Gans BM, eds. Philadelphia: Lippincot-Raven; 1998. p. 1517-1544.
World Health Organization. Guidelines for training personnel in developing countries for prosthetics and orthotics services. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.
Fondo Nacional de la Discapacidad. Primer estudio nacional de la discapacidad ENDISC-CIF. Chile; 2005. http://www.senadis.gob.cl/descarga/I/323/documento
International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics. c2021. [citado el 12 de enero de 2021] Disponible en: https://www.ispoint.org/page/POservices
Resnik L, Meucci MR, Lieberman-Klinger S, Fantini C, Kelty DL, Disla R, et al. Advanced Upper Limb Prosthetic Devices: Implications for Upper Limb Prosthetic Rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medici¬ne and Rehabilitation. 2012;93(4): 710-7. doi:10.1016/j. apmr.2011.11.010.
Ritchie S. Perceptions of cosmesis and function in adults with upper limb prostheses: a systema- tic literature review. The International Society for
Prosthetics and Orthotics. 2011;35(4):341-332. doi: 10.1177/0309364611420326 poi.sagepub.com
Pereira BP, Kour AK, Leow EL, Pho RW. Benefits and use of digital prostheses. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 1996;21(2): 228-222.
Valbuena S. Generalities in the assessment of work disabilities. Aspects of functional assessment of the hand. Revista Iberoamericana de Fisioterapia y Kinesiología. 2004; (7): 40-35.
Ravanal I. Ortoprotesis una alternativa en amputaciones de mano. Revista Chilena de Rehabilitación de mano. 1999 2(1): p. 32-25.
Gretsch KF, Lather HD, Peddada KV, Deeken CR, Wall LB, Goldfarb CA. Development of novel 3D printed robotic prosthetic for transradial amputees. Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 2016 Jun;40(3):400-3.doi: 10.1177/0309364615579317. Epub 2015 May 1.
Gross BC, Erkal JL, Lockwood SY, Chen C, Spence DM. Evaluation of 3D Printing and Its Potential Impact on Biotechnology and the Chemical Sciences. Analytical Chemistry. 2014;86(7), 3253-3240. doi:10.1021/ ac403397r.
Mejía O. Los aparatos racional y afectivo en la respuesta
conductual del hombre: un análisis teórico. Revista electrónica de psicología Iztacala. 2018;21(1). 52-21.
Hernández R, Fernández C, Baptista P. Metodología de la Investigación (6a Edic). México: McGrall Hill; 2014.
Casal J, Mateu E. Tipos de muestreo. Rev. Epidem. Med. Prev. 2003;1(1), 7-3.
Mertens DM. Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qua- litative, and mixed methods. Sage publications. 2014.
Gable C, Xenard J, Makiela E, Chau N. Évaluation fonctionnelle de la main. Bilan 400 points et test chi- ffrés. Elsevier, Paris. Ann Réadaptation Méd Phys. 1996 ; 40: 101-95.
Turner A. Terapia ocupacional y disfunción física, Ma¬drid, Elsevier. 2003.
Discapacidad del Brazo, Hombro y Mano, Versión Es¬pañola (Chile). c2006. [citado el 09 de marzo de 2021]. Disponible en: http://www.dash.iwh.on.ca/sites/dash/public/translations/Scoring_DASH_Spanish_%20Chile.pdf
Olivares P. Estado de Salud de Beneficiarios del Sistema de Salud de Chile: 2004-2005. Departamento de Estu¬dios y Desarrollo, Superintendencia de Isapres. 2006.
